Today in fat hate
Sep. 16th, 2010 08:39 pmWhat is the "obesity crisis"? Every day I get more and more confused.
Today, I read an article in the Guardian that said "exercise protects against heart disease, type 2 diabetes, osteoperosis and high blood pressure". (Which I think has already been pretty well evidenced, to be honest, but it's still a useful thing to put out in the public domain, encouraging people to adopt healthier lifestyles.) But it said this in paragraph ten. The first nine paragraphs of the article? Maybe the headline alone will give you a clue - Exercise alone 'will not solve obesity crisis'.
So exercise has a positive effect on all of the illnesses commonly correlated with fat bodies, but doesn't erase those fat bodies, so isn't good enough. The mask is slipping; anti-obesity campaigners like to hide behind the idea that their determination to erase my body comes out of concern for my health, but here they show themselves encouraging dangerous behaviour (aggressive food restriction) over healthy behaviour (daily exercise) because the former has a perceived aesthetic benefit while the latter "only" protects against heart disease, diabetes, osteoperosis...
Well, fuck them. They want me to fight to be happy? Then I will fight and fuck and dance and laugh and scream and fight.



I'm just gonna keep calling it out when I see it, because I don't know what else I can do.
Today, I read an article in the Guardian that said "exercise protects against heart disease, type 2 diabetes, osteoperosis and high blood pressure". (Which I think has already been pretty well evidenced, to be honest, but it's still a useful thing to put out in the public domain, encouraging people to adopt healthier lifestyles.) But it said this in paragraph ten. The first nine paragraphs of the article? Maybe the headline alone will give you a clue - Exercise alone 'will not solve obesity crisis'.
So exercise has a positive effect on all of the illnesses commonly correlated with fat bodies, but doesn't erase those fat bodies, so isn't good enough. The mask is slipping; anti-obesity campaigners like to hide behind the idea that their determination to erase my body comes out of concern for my health, but here they show themselves encouraging dangerous behaviour (aggressive food restriction) over healthy behaviour (daily exercise) because the former has a perceived aesthetic benefit while the latter "only" protects against heart disease, diabetes, osteoperosis...
Well, fuck them. They want me to fight to be happy? Then I will fight and fuck and dance and laugh and scream and fight.



I'm just gonna keep calling it out when I see it, because I don't know what else I can do.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-16 10:18 pm (UTC)I'm interested in what you mean here. Reducing calorie consumption, exercising, etc etc - none of those things are in and of themselves going to lead to only temporary weight loss - if you're able (and not everyone is) to lose weight, and one of those methods works for you, it will continue to work for as long as you sustain it.
Fad diets don't not work because they 'don't work' - they do work in a literal, practical sense. They don't work because they're emotionally and mentally unsustainable for anyone with normal levels of self-control or respect for their own contentment. They don't work because they're depressing and soul-destroying - and consequently unsustainable. With a few exceptions (ie: the diets that will actually damage you if you stick at them) a change of diet or lifestyle will result in permanent weight loss if it's sustained.
The trick to health (whether thin or fat health), therefore, is finding the lifestyle changes that you personally can sustain permanently without wanting to kill yourself. Now, you know this. Which makes me wonder (without wanting to seem aggressive at all) what it is you're describing as 'temporary'.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-16 10:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-16 10:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-17 06:53 am (UTC)I think that the answer is probably a couple of extra sentences that fully explain the issues, rather than using '(temporary)' as a modifier in the way that I did. I'll try to remember this for next time.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-17 07:55 am (UTC)I think that for me, the idea that lifestyle changes that you can actually sustain - for anyone, fat, thin or otherwise - is also really important to promote - not least because that idea of sustainability is one that I think is vital to people's understanding that these fad diets are a waste of time from beginning to end. So I'm pretty sensitive about careful wording in that respect.