(no subject)
Jul. 16th, 2007 03:01 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
sebastienneMark breakdown!
Philosophy of Science & Philosophy of Psychology & Neuroscience
You said: 60
Actual mark: 67
Aesthetics & Philosophy of Criticism
You said: 64
Actual mark: 66
Knowledge & Reality
You said: 64
Actual mark: 64
Bullseye!
Language & Cognition
You said: 57
Actual mark: 64
Personality & Psychological Disorders
You said: 59 or 65, depending on tolerance for waffle
Actual mark: 66.7
Emotion: Appraisal & Feedback
You said: Nothing, because you'd finished, you didn't care!
Actual mark: 71.3
First!
Clearly, the expectation of fizzy wine does wonders for one's performance in examinations.
I'm not sure I deserved to do this well. Certainly not in Philosophy of Science, where one of my answers only referred to half of the question, because I'd never heard of the other half.. I can only assume that the Philosophy of Psychology was good enough to balance it out. Drinking coffee with the examiner has its uses, you know!
Philosophy of Science & Philosophy of Psychology & Neuroscience
You said: 60
Actual mark: 67
Aesthetics & Philosophy of Criticism
You said: 64
Actual mark: 66
Knowledge & Reality
You said: 64
Actual mark: 64
Bullseye!
Language & Cognition
You said: 57
Actual mark: 64
Personality & Psychological Disorders
You said: 59 or 65, depending on tolerance for waffle
Actual mark: 66.7
Emotion: Appraisal & Feedback
You said: Nothing, because you'd finished, you didn't care!
Actual mark: 71.3
First!
Clearly, the expectation of fizzy wine does wonders for one's performance in examinations.
I'm not sure I deserved to do this well. Certainly not in Philosophy of Science, where one of my answers only referred to half of the question, because I'd never heard of the other half.. I can only assume that the Philosophy of Psychology was good enough to balance it out. Drinking coffee with the examiner has its uses, you know!