(no subject)
Mar. 16th, 2007 10:29 amTuesday 27th March
Social Sciences interview panel
10.30: Start
Tour of Said Business School library
Tour of Social Sciences Library
Interview with panel
Test (shelving books etc)
12.30: Finish
I guess I need to get breaking in my interview shoes, for the station-St Catz walk (TMI-note: make sure I'm wearing something under my skirt to stop thigh-chafing), and need to swot up on the shelving practices of the SSL.
Petty perfectionist that I am, I'm torn between "yay! I gots me an interview!" and "damn, social sciences, no chance of getting the RSL/Sackler/History fac then".
Social Sciences interview panel
10.30: Start
Tour of Said Business School library
Tour of Social Sciences Library
Interview with panel
Test (shelving books etc)
12.30: Finish
I guess I need to get breaking in my interview shoes, for the station-St Catz walk (TMI-note: make sure I'm wearing something under my skirt to stop thigh-chafing), and need to swot up on the shelving practices of the SSL.
Petty perfectionist that I am, I'm torn between "yay! I gots me an interview!" and "damn, social sciences, no chance of getting the RSL/Sackler/History fac then".
no subject
Date: 2007-03-16 11:05 am (UTC)Hmm, only used the SSL once. I seem to remember it having some quite interesting stuff tho, and being rather shiny.
It uses the Library of Congress classification scheme. Interesting. It's a confusing scheme in some ways, because it only shows high level hierarchies. On the other hand, it's good as shelfmarks don't get as horribly long and drawn out as Dewey ones can, all of them are one or two letters and then 3 or 4 numbers.
The letters show how things are ordered in a hierarchy- "JC" (political theory) is part of "J" (political science).
But the numbers don't reflect a hierarchy, all the sub-concepts are just listed in any old order. So unlike Dewey JC491 is not part of JC490.
Shelving with LoC is fairly easy, as long as you know the alphabet (which caused me some problems at my last workplace!)
no subject
Date: 2007-03-16 11:25 am (UTC)I personally don't like LC -
no subject
Date: 2007-03-16 11:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-16 01:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-16 01:21 pm (UTC)I actually worked at the SBS for six weeks once. The library is very modern, with surprisingly few books(though they seem a lot when you shelf them) and a lot of electronic resources. The people working there were really nice. The atmosphere is very un-library-like, in that it is noisy, people are allowed to use their mobile phones in the lower part of the library, and chatt a lot. This can be a bit of a shock if you come from or expect a more traditional library environment. And they have a self-checkout system which is scary but useful, as it cuts down on the work you have to do at the desk.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-16 01:29 pm (UTC)I always liked the SSL; rarely used it, but I'd regularly meet a friend of mine there.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-16 03:36 pm (UTC)Thanks for your help, by the way - makes me feel a lot calmer about the whole affair.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-16 03:40 pm (UTC)And thanks for all your help though, it makes me feel a lot less scared and a lot more like I can go in there and be impressive.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-16 03:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-16 04:36 pm (UTC)Nuffield has a lot of stairs. You have been warned.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-16 04:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-16 10:46 pm (UTC)Good luck! :D
no subject
Date: 2007-03-17 02:00 am (UTC)